<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><Results><Result><RaceName>Initiative Measure No. 1185 Concerns tax and fee increases imposed by state government</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1892969</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>63.91</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Initiative Measure No. 1185 Concerns tax and fee increases imposed by state government</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1069083</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>36.09</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Initiative Measure No. 1240 Concerns creation of a public charter school system</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1525807</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>50.69</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Initiative Measure No. 1240 Concerns creation of a public charter school system</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1484125</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>49.31</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Referendum Measure No. 74 Concerns marriage for same-sex couples</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1659915</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>53.7</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Referendum Measure No. 74 Concerns marriage for same-sex couples</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1431285</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>46.3</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Initiative Measure No. 502 Concerns marijuana</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1724209</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>55.7</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Initiative Measure No. 502 Concerns marijuana</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1371235</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>44.3</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Engrossed Senate Joint Resolution No. 8221 Concerns implementing the Commission on State Debt recommendations regarding Washington's debt limit</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1748436</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>62.91</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Engrossed Senate Joint Resolution No. 8221 Concerns implementing the Commission on State Debt recommendations regarding Washington's debt limit</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1031039</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>37.09</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Senate Joint Resolution No. 8223 Concerns investments by the University of Washington and Washington State University</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1258969</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>43.99</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Senate Joint Resolution No. 8223 Concerns investments by the University of Washington and Washington State University</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1602785</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>56.01</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Measures</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Advisory Vote No. 1 (Engrossed Senate Bill 6635) Concerns a B&amp;O tax deduction for certain financial institutions' interest on residential loans</RaceName><Candidate>Repealed</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1552134</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>56.9</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Advisory Votes</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Advisory Vote No. 1 (Engrossed Senate Bill 6635) Concerns a B&amp;O tax deduction for certain financial institutions' interest on residential loans</RaceName><Candidate>Maintained</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1175863</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>43.1</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Advisory Votes</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Advisory Vote No. 2 (Substitute House Bill 2590) Concerns expiration of a tax on possession of petroleum products</RaceName><Candidate>Repealed</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1476491</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>55</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Advisory Votes</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Advisory Vote No. 2 (Substitute House Bill 2590) Concerns expiration of a tax on possession of petroleum products</RaceName><Candidate>Maintained</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>1207812</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>45</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>State Advisory Votes</JurisdictionName></Result></Results>