<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><Results><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1053 Concerning tax and fee increases imposed by state government.</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>51008</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>60.7477</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1053 Concerning tax and fee increases imposed by state government.</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>32959</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>39.2523</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1082 Concerning industrial insurance.</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>37495</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>45.4992</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1082 Concerning industrial insurance.</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>44913</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>54.5008</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1098 Concerning establishing a state income tax and reducing other taxes.</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>34525</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>40.4473</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1098 Concerning establishing a state income tax and reducing other taxes.</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>50833</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>59.5527</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1100 Concerning liquor (beer, wine and spirits).</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>39808</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>46.6196</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1100 Concerning liquor (beer, wine and spirits).</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>45581</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>53.3804</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1105 Concerning liquor (beer, wine and spirits).</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>35062</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>41.2203</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1105 Concerning liquor (beer, wine and spirits).</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>49998</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>58.7797</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1107 Concerns reversing certain 2010 amendments to state tax laws.</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>50125</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>58.599</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1107 Concerns reversing certain 2010 amendments to state tax laws.</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>35414</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>41.401</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Referendum Bill 52 Concerning authorizing and funding bonds for energy efficiency projects in schools.  </RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>40776</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>48.6732</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Referendum Bill 52 Concerning authorizing and funding bonds for energy efficiency projects in schools.  </RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>42999</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>51.3268</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Senate Joint Resolution 8225 Concerns the limitation on state debt.</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>35607</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>46.4207</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Senate Joint Resolution 8225 Concerns the limitation on state debt.</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>41098</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>53.5793</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Engrossed Substitute House Joint Resolution 4220 Concerning denying bail for persons charged with certain criminal offenses.</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>68899</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>82.2969</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Engrossed Substitute House Joint Resolution 4220 Concerning denying bail for persons charged with certain criminal offenses.</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>14821</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>17.7031</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>United States U.S. Senator</RaceName><Candidate>Patty Murray</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>44783</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>52.487</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>United States</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>United States U.S. Senator</RaceName><Candidate>Dino Rossi</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>40539</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>47.513</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>United States</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Congressional District 2 U.S. Representative</RaceName><Candidate>John Koster</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>39641</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>46.5724</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Congressional District 2</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Congressional District 2 U.S. Representative</RaceName><Candidate>Rick Larsen</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>45476</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>53.4276</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Congressional District 2</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 39 State Representative Pos. 1</RaceName><Candidate>Dan Kristiansen</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>12</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>60</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 39</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 39 State Representative Pos. 1</RaceName><Candidate>Eleanor Walters</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>8</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>40</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 39</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 39 State Representative Pos. 2</RaceName><Candidate>Kirk Pearson</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>16</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 39</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 40 State Representative Pos. 1</RaceName><Candidate>Kristine Lytton</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>14307</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>62.2179</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 40</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 40 State Representative Pos. 1</RaceName><Candidate>Mike Newman</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>8688</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>37.7821</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 40</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 40 State Representative Pos. 2</RaceName><Candidate>Jeff Morris</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>14133</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>61.4532</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 40</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 40 State Representative Pos. 2</RaceName><Candidate>John Swapp</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>8865</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>38.5468</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 40</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 42 State Senator</RaceName><Candidate>Doug Ericksen</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>36293</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>59.8983</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 42</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 42 State Senator</RaceName><Candidate>Pat Jerns</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>24298</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>40.1017</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 42</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 42 State Representative Pos. 1</RaceName><Candidate>Jason Overstreet</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>31885</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>52.7522</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 42</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 42 State Representative Pos. 1</RaceName><Candidate>Al Jensen</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>28558</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>47.2478</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 42</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 42 State Representative Pos. 2</RaceName><Candidate>Vincent Buys</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>30608</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>50.1261</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 42</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 42 State Representative Pos. 2</RaceName><Candidate>Kelli Linville</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>30454</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>49.8739</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 42</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Whatcom County Prosecuting Attorney</RaceName><Candidate>David S. McEachran</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>59069</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Whatcom County</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Supreme Court Justice Position 1</RaceName><Candidate>Jim Johnson</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>53930</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Supreme Court</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Supreme Court Justice Position 5</RaceName><Candidate>Barbara Madsen</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>51997</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Supreme Court</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Supreme Court Justice Position 6</RaceName><Candidate>Richard B. Sanders</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>34225</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>50.3857</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Supreme Court</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Supreme Court Justice Position 6</RaceName><Candidate>Charlie Wiggins</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>33701</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>49.6143</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Supreme Court</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Whatcom County Council District 1 Position B</RaceName><Candidate>Jean Melious</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>32774</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>44.2354</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Whatcom County</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Whatcom County Council District 1 Position B</RaceName><Candidate>Tony Larson</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>41316</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>55.7646</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Whatcom County</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Whatcom County District Court Judge Position 1</RaceName><Candidate>David Grant</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>52004</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Whatcom County</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Whatcom County District Court Judge Position 2</RaceName><Candidate>Matthew Elich</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>52514</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Whatcom County</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>City of Bellingham Proposition No. 1 Sales and Use Tax for Transportation Improvements</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>18013</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>58.4098</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>City of Bellingham</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>City of Bellingham Proposition No. 1 Sales and Use Tax for Transportation Improvements</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>12826</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>41.5902</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>City of Bellingham</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Bellingham School District 501 Proposition No. 1 Supplemental Education Support Levy</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>25414</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>62.3748</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Bellingham School District 501</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Bellingham School District 501 Proposition No. 1 Supplemental Education Support Levy</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>15330</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>37.6252</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Bellingham School District 501</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Fire Protection District 11 Proposition No. 1 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Regular Property Tax Levy</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>494</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>83.5871</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Fire Protection District 11</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Fire Protection District 11 Proposition No. 1 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Regular Property Tax Levy</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>97</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>16.4129</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Fire Protection District 11</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Fire Protection District 5 Proposition No. 1 Board of Commissioners - Proposition Authorizing Property Tax Levy</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>285</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>60</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Fire Protection District 5</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Fire Protection District 5 Proposition No. 1 Board of Commissioners - Proposition Authorizing Property Tax Levy</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>190</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>40</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Fire Protection District 5</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Northwest Park and Recreation District 2 Proposition No. 1 Parks and Recreation Regular Property Tax Levy</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>3541</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>57.5492</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Northwest Park and Recreation District 2</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Northwest Park and Recreation District 2 Proposition No. 1 Parks and Recreation Regular Property Tax Levy</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>2612</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>42.4508</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Northwest Park and Recreation District 2</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Public Utility District 3 Commissioner District 3</RaceName><Candidate>Mike Murphy</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>53482</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Public Utility District 3</JurisdictionName></Result></Results>