<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><Results><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1053 Concerning tax and fee increases imposed by state government.</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>886</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>77.4476</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1053 Concerning tax and fee increases imposed by state government.</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>258</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>22.5524</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1082 Concerning industrial insurance.</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>499</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>43.9261</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1082 Concerning industrial insurance.</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>637</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>56.0739</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1098 Concerning establishing a state income tax and reducing other taxes.</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>268</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>22.9452</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1098 Concerning establishing a state income tax and reducing other taxes.</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>900</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>77.0548</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1100 Concerning liquor (beer, wine and spirits).</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>397</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>33.7012</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1100 Concerning liquor (beer, wine and spirits).</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>781</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>66.2988</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1105 Concerning liquor (beer, wine and spirits).</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>325</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>27.5891</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1105 Concerning liquor (beer, wine and spirits).</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>853</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>72.4109</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1107 Concerns reversing certain 2010 amendments to state tax laws.</RaceName><Candidate>Yes</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>936</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>78.6555</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Initiative Measure 1107 Concerns reversing certain 2010 amendments to state tax laws.</RaceName><Candidate>No</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>254</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>21.3445</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Referendum Bill 52 Concerning authorizing and funding bonds for energy efficiency projects in schools.  </RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>371</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>32.0934</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Referendum Bill 52 Concerning authorizing and funding bonds for energy efficiency projects in schools.  </RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>785</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>67.9066</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Senate Joint Resolution 8225 Concerns the limitation on state debt.</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>457</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>43.6485</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Senate Joint Resolution 8225 Concerns the limitation on state debt.</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>590</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>56.3515</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Engrossed Substitute House Joint Resolution 4220 Concerning denying bail for persons charged with certain criminal offenses.</RaceName><Candidate>Approved</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>990</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>85.6401</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Statewide Engrossed Substitute House Joint Resolution 4220 Concerning denying bail for persons charged with certain criminal offenses.</RaceName><Candidate>Rejected</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>166</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>14.3599</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Statewide</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>United States U.S. Senator</RaceName><Candidate>Patty Murray</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>340</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>29.2599</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>United States</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>United States U.S. Senator</RaceName><Candidate>Dino Rossi</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>822</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>70.7401</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>United States</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Congressional District 5 U.S. Representative</RaceName><Candidate>Cathy McMorris Rodgers</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>904</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>77.1331</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Congressional District 5</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Congressional District 5 U.S. Representative</RaceName><Candidate>Daryl Romeyn</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>268</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>22.8669</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Congressional District 5</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 9 State Representative Pos. 1</RaceName><Candidate>Susan Fagan</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>963</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 9</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 9 State Representative Pos. 2</RaceName><Candidate>Joe Schmick</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>831</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>81.7913</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 9</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Legislative District 9 State Representative Pos. 2</RaceName><Candidate>Glen R. Stockwell</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>185</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>18.2087</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Legislative District 9</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 COUNTY ASSESSOR</RaceName><Candidate>Colleen Ledgerwood</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>956</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 COUNTY AUDITOR</RaceName><Candidate>Donna J. Deal</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>997</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 COUNTY CLERK</RaceName><Candidate>Terrilie Cox</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>1030</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 COUNTY COMMISSIONER 3</RaceName><Candidate>Dean D. Burton</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>912</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 COUNTY PROSECUTOR</RaceName><Candidate>Matt L. Newberg</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>976</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 COUNTY SHERIFF</RaceName><Candidate>Bennie W Keller</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democratic Party)</Party><Votes>989</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 COUNTY TREASURER</RaceName><Candidate>Lynnette Fischer</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Republican Party)</Party><Votes>458</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>38.8465</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 COUNTY TREASURER</RaceName><Candidate>Karen Roosevelt</Candidate><Party>(Prefers Democrat Party)</Party><Votes>721</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>61.1535</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Supreme Court Justice Position 1</RaceName><Candidate>Jim Johnson</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>802</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Supreme Court</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Supreme Court Justice Position 5</RaceName><Candidate>Barbara Madsen</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>770</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Supreme Court</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Supreme Court Justice Position 6</RaceName><Candidate>Richard B. Sanders</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>414</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>48.4211</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Supreme Court</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Supreme Court Justice Position 6</RaceName><Candidate>Charlie Wiggins</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>441</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>51.5789</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Supreme Court</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>Court of Appeals, Division 3, District 2 Judge Position 1</RaceName><Candidate>Dennis Sweeney</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>744</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>Court of Appeals, Division 3, District 2</JurisdictionName></Result><Result><RaceName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01 DISTRICT COURT JUDGE</RaceName><Candidate>John R. Henry</Candidate><Party></Party><Votes>800</Votes><PercentageOfTotalVote>100</PercentageOfTotalVote><JurisdictionName>COUNTY WIDE DISTRICT 01</JurisdictionName></Result></Results>